And they really are a single platform, with Make simply disabling a few features - which are actually available for the first 30 days of use! The underlying problem - drawing primitives on layers other than Layer0 - occurs frequently (at least from evidence on this forum) on both platforms. If you want to talk about changes to the meaning of layers, merging them with the outliner, or anything other than a relatively simple UI change, then please break it off into its own thread! I’d have made this plea sooner if I hadn’t been very busy yesterday, thus not seeing the tangential discussions until just now.Īre your suggested feature requests applicable to Free or Pro?īoth - but as I don’t use Free on the web, and as Free has a significantly different UI, I have no recommendation as to how best to implement my suggestion.īut, since you’re profile suggests that you use a downloadable version of Sketchup, I suspect you were really asking if I want to apply this change to Make and Pro. In addition to a flag in View–>Model Information, the two methods just posted (with GIFs!) would do as well. ![]() Changing the UI only would accomplish this, without the need for any changes to the modeling engine. There may be other rare exceptions.Īs the original poster, I intended this thread to be solely about a way to make breaking Rule 3 difficult. Rare Exception: When an edge needs to exist for modeling purposes, but should never be seen. Keep the edges and faces in your model on Layer0.Contours, Ground Cover, Plants, Walkways, Decorative Features, etc. Use layers to control visibility for conceptually separate geometric collections (Floors, Walls, Roof, Furniture, etc.Use Groups or Components to prevent geometric primitive collections from interacting with other geometric primitives.Adding an isolation function to layers - or to the outliner - would involved major (I assume) changes to the underlying modeling engine and induce additional complexity to something that doesn’t need to be complex if you follow a few rules: SketchUp does that through groups and components. The need to isolate geometric collections from one another remains. There’s just too much discussion here, and documentation on Trimble, YouTube, Sketchucation, and other sites around layers to even contemplate changing the name. There’s just too much institutional inertia, both with Trimble (and it’s predecessors) and in this forum, to make changing the name of the visibility control something we might hope for. Layers are here to stay, including the confusion induced by a name that, in other drawing/modeling programs, has a fundamentally different meaning. This topic is, in my opinion, straying a bit (perhaps quite a bit) beyond my original suggestion to make changes to the UI only (no change to the modeling engine) to make it harder for a newbie to make a frequent mistake.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |